# HEAT\_TEMP

**URL:** <https://oscat.discourse.group/t/heat-temp/394>\
**Category:** Bestehende Module / Existing Modules\
**Created:** [24. September 2008 um 16:43 UTC](https://oscat.discourse.group/t/heat-temp/394 "2008-09-24T16:43:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/oscat/original/1X/2efdfb9c592ff9a666c94dff124ee84fa863dae5.jpeg) [@system](https://oscat.discourse.group/u/system)\
**Post date:** [24. September 2008 um 16:43 UTC](https://oscat.discourse.group/t/heat-temp/394/1 "2008-09-24T16:43:45Z")

</div>

In the heat\_temp plain text i think there is a bad formula?

"  
T\_int - offset + (TY\_config - T\_int) \* EXPT((T\_int - offset - T\_ext) / (T\_int - offset - T\_ext\_config),1 / C)  
"  
If i want a positive offset i have to put a minus number in there..

This is how i think it should look..

T\_int + offset + (TY\_config - T\_int + offset) \* EXPT((T\_int + offset - T\_ext) / (T\_int + offset - T\_ext\_config),1 / C)

Anyone elses opinion?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/oscat/original/1X/2efdfb9c592ff9a666c94dff124ee84fa863dae5.jpeg) [@system](https://oscat.discourse.group/u/system)\
**Post date:** [24. September 2008 um 18:11 UTC](https://oscat.discourse.group/t/heat-temp/394/2 "2008-09-24T18:11:16Z")

</div>

Sorry ment:

T\_int + offset + (TY\_config - T\_int - offset) \* EXPT((T\_int + offset - T\_ext) / (T\_int + offset - T\_ext\_config),1 / C)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/oscat/original/1X/2efdfb9c592ff9a666c94dff124ee84fa863dae5.jpeg) [@system](https://oscat.discourse.group/u/system)\
**Post date:** [24. September 2008 um 19:53 UTC](https://oscat.discourse.group/t/heat-temp/394/3 "2008-09-24T19:53:24Z")

</div>

Last correction (I hope)

T\_int + offset + (TY\_config - T\_int) \* EXPT((T\_int + offset - T\_ext) / (T\_int + offset - T\_ext\_config),1 / C)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hugo](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/oscat.discourse.group/hugo/32/133_2.png) [@hugo](https://oscat.discourse.group/u/hugo)\
**Post date:** [24. September 2008 um 20:29 UTC](https://oscat.discourse.group/t/heat-temp/394/4 "2008-09-24T20:29:11Z")

</div>

danke für den input wir werden das noch kontrollieren und gegebenenfalls verbessern

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hugo](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/oscat.discourse.group/hugo/32/133_2.png) [@hugo](https://oscat.discourse.group/u/hugo)\
**Post date:** [26. September 2008 um 18:33 UTC](https://oscat.discourse.group/t/heat-temp/394/5 "2008-09-26T18:33:28Z")

</div>

1. die formal im manual wurde korrigiert, ist jetzt in ordnung
2. auch der heat temp wurde etwas erweitert und verbessert.
3. auch ein fehler in heat temp wurde gefunden und beseitigt.

danke für deine mithilfe

das nächste release 2.77 enthält den neuen baustein

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/oscat/original/1X/2efdfb9c592ff9a666c94dff124ee84fa863dae5.jpeg) [@system](https://oscat.discourse.group/u/system)\
**Post date:** [27. September 2008 um 22:47 UTC](https://oscat.discourse.group/t/heat-temp/394/6 "2008-09-27T22:47:57Z")

</div>

Sounds really good, thank you all working with this..